Re: IESG Comment on SSL
jkrey@isi.edu Fri, 24 March 1995 18:04 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04261; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04257; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05565; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04250; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04244; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05560; 24 Mar 95 13:04 EST
Received: from akamai.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-21) id <AA27276>; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 10:05:13 -0800
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 10:06:29 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: jkrey@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 10:06:29 -0800
Message-Id: <199503241806.AA08606@akamai.isi.edu>
Received: by akamai.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA08606>; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 10:06:29 -0800
To: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: IESG Comment on SSL
Cc: iesg@isi.edu
This still holds true: To: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu> Cc: Klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net, jkrey@ISI.EDU Subject: Re: IESG Comment on SSL Date: Fri, 24 Mar 95 12:34:20 -0500 From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> >> I assume that your note implies that they have not done so. The impression I had from Joyce (I've added her to this envelope) was that the SSL document was still in the RFC Editor queue, and that Netscape still wanted it to go Informational. ----------------------------- Joyce
- Re: IESG Comment on SSL jkrey
- Re: IESG Comment on SSL Steve Coya