SUN Agreement

"Vinton G. Cerf" <0001050002@mcimail.com> Wed, 05 April 1995 22:20 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08089; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08085; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15515; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08076; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08072; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from dg02sg.mcimail.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15510; 5 Apr 95 18:20 EDT
Received: from mailgate.mcimail.com (mailgate.mcimail.com [166.38.40.3]) by dg02sg.mcimail.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id WAA06984 for <iesg@cnri.reston.va.us>; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 22:20:04 GMT
Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id ad26939; 5 Apr 95 22:17 WET
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 95 17:18 EST
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Vinton G. Cerf" <0001050002@mcimail.com>
To: iesg <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: SUN Agreement
Message-Id: <62950405221826/0001050002NA4EM@MCIMAIL.COM>

I have received a fax from Steve Nahm requesting additional
changes to the agreement with SUN that I have now signed three
times. This will be number four. Does anyone at IESG want to
look over the final version (Steve is reportedly at IETF) before
I proceed?

I don't think the changes alter the basic intent - they
just clarify that only the specs and not the implementations
are being transferred. 

Vint