ONCRPC

mankin@isi.edu Fri, 17 March 1995 21:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10149; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10145; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17627; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10133; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10129; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17622; 17 Mar 95 16:50 EST
Received: by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA09506>; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 13:50:44 -0800
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 13:50:44 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: mankin@isi.edu
Message-Id: <199503172150.AA09506@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: ONCRPC

Hi,

Transport has this WG.  I have long since had
a review done by the Directorate of the oncrpc drafts,
but indeed, had told the WG chair that the Last Call
had to await the legal machinations (as advised).

I haven't been reading all of your "one last nits", folks,
so I'm not sure what's up.  Is the agreement to the point
that the IESG can proceed on our normal Last Call procedure?
Is that the question?  

Allison