Re: One last nit

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Sat, 18 March 1995 02:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13454; 17 Mar 95 21:00 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13450; 17 Mar 95 21:00 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22394; 17 Mar 95 21:00 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13441; 17 Mar 95 20:59 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13435; 17 Mar 95 20:59 EST
Received: from [128.103.65.15] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22366; 17 Mar 95 20:59 EST
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id VAA11284; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 21:03:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 21:03:15 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199503180203.VAA11284@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net, scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: One last nit
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US

> we ought to wait until the agreement has been signed by BOTH parties!

yes we should

Scott