Re: RFC1770

Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu> Sun, 26 March 1995 10:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00965; 26 Mar 95 5:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00961; 26 Mar 95 5:50 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02227; 26 Mar 95 5:50 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00952; 26 Mar 95 5:49 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00948; 26 Mar 95 5:49 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02221; 26 Mar 95 5:49 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA21846>; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 02:50:27 -0800
Message-Id: <199503261050.AA21846@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: braden@isi.edu
Reply-To: mankin@isi.edu
Subject: Re: RFC1770
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, iab@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:29:16 -0800. <199503231929.AA17873@can.isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 95 02:50:27 PST
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>

Bob,

I'm in a "don't take any more bad feeling than I already
have" state of mind and I want to make sure you know that
the IESG wasn't given RFC1770!  It apparently slipped
through Jon's and Joyce's cracks, since the RFC-Editor usually asks us
to review and annotate (if necessary) submissions that fall
into our technical areas of purview. 


Allison