Re: IESG's support
"L.H. Landweber" <lhl@cs.wisc.edu> Thu, 06 April 1995 12:30 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01699; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01695; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04360; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01686; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01682; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Received: from parmesan.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04342; 6 Apr 95 8:30 EDT
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 1995 07:30:59 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "L.H. Landweber" <lhl@cs.wisc.edu>
Message-Id: <9504061230.AA14972@parmesan.cs.wisc.edu>
Received: by parmesan.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 6 Apr 95 07:30:59 -0500
To: klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
Subject: Re: IESG's support
Cc: 0001050002@mcimail.com, bdains@linus.isoc.org, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, isoc-trustees@linus.isoc.org, lhl@cs.wisc.edu, mo@uunet.uu.net, pvm@isi.edu
john, mike we have thought about the problem of non ietf, inet attendees caussing problems for ietf wg s. one solution would be to use badges to limit attendance at either inet or ietf sessions to people who have registered for that meeting. of course, this would not stop curious inet attendees from registering for both. but maybe that might be ok. wrt reporters, i would suggest that we would not include ietf sessions in their complimentary registrations. when faced with having to pay the full amount to attend an ietf wg, my guess is that most reporters would choose to find people in the hallways. i share your concern on this point. it probably is the main issue that might impact on the viability of coincident meetings. regards larry
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Christian Huitema
- Re: IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Dan Lynch
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Geoff Huston
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: INET and IETF together.... Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Charles Brownstein
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support stev
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support Bev Dains
- Re: IESG's support Allison Mankin
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Tomaz Kalin
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Charles Brownstein
- Re: IESG's support Geoff Huston
- Re: IESG's support stev
- Re: IESG's support stev