Sneak preview 2
Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu> Mon, 20 March 1995 16:33 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05855; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05851; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08700; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05844; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05840; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08695; 20 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA07504>; Mon, 20 Mar 1995 08:33:45 -0800
Message-Id: <199503201633.AA07504@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Sneak preview 2
Reply-To: pvm@isi.edu
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 08:33:42 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu>
One of my theories on reforming the ISOC deals with selecting its trustees. In my quest to be helpful, you will soon be receiving the results of my survey. Results received from everyone but Vint. paul USC/Information Sciences Institute phone: 310-822-1511 x285 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA fax: 310-823-6714 90292 ------- Forwarded Message Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1995 14:16:43 -0800 From: Paul Mockapetris <pvm@aloha.isi.edu> To: frode.greisen@uni-c.dk, cerf@isoc.org, tim@ora.com, barrett@ee.und.ac.za, janetp@novell.com, george_sadowsky@nyu.edu, Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr, G.Huston@aarnet.edu.au, mckenzie@bbn.com, ellswort@tenet.edu Subject: Request for Information Hi, All of you are candidates for the board of trustees of ISOC. One of the questions that concerns a lot of people in the IETF, particularly those that are also members of ISOC, is your position on the relationship between the IETF and ISOC. I'd appreciate it if you could take the time to let us know your views on two questions: The ISOC has cut is support of the IETF to zero, and has taken some other decisions which some in the IETF question. Do you feel: a) ISOC support of IETF has been adequate or better? b) ISOC support of IETF has not been adeqaute c) no opinion The IETF is not part of ISOC at present, but it tries to execute a standards process which is related to the ISOC. Do you believe that the IETF has the right of self-determination in the matter of a) its relationship to ISOC? b) the organization of the stardards process? If you wish to keep your response private, please let me know. Thanks, paul USC/Information Sciences Institute phone: 310-822-1511 x285 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA fax: 310-823-6714 90292 ------- End of Forwarded Message
- Sneak preview 2 Paul Mockapetris