Sneak preview 2

[Paul Mockapetris <[e-mail]>]

One of my theories on reforming the ISOC deals with selecting its
trustees.  In my quest to be helpful, you will soon be receiving the
results of my survey.  Results received from everyone but Vint.

paul
 
USC/Information Sciences Institute      phone: [phone] x285
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA  fax:   [phone]
90292           

------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Thu, 09 Mar 1995 14:16:43 -0800
From:    Paul Mockapetris <[e-mail]>
To:      [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
	 [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
	 [e-mail], [e-mail],
	 [e-mail], [e-mail]
Subject: Request for Information

Hi,

All of you are candidates for the board of trustees of ISOC.  One of
the questions that concerns a lot of people in the IETF, particularly
those that are also members of ISOC, is your position on the
relationship between the IETF and ISOC.

I'd appreciate it if you could take the time to let us know your views
on two questions:

The ISOC has cut is support of the IETF to zero, and has taken some
other decisions which some in the IETF question.

Do you feel:

	a) ISOC support of IETF has been adequate or better?
	b) ISOC support of IETF has not been adeqaute
	c) no opinion

The IETF is not part of ISOC at present, but it tries to execute a
standards process which is related to the ISOC.  Do you believe that
the IETF has the right of self-determination in the matter of

	a) its relationship to ISOC?
	b) the organization of the stardards process?

If you wish to keep your response private, please let me know.

Thanks,

paul
 
USC/Information Sciences Institute      phone: [phone] x285
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA  fax:   [phone]
90292           

------- End of Forwarded Message