Re: IESG's support
"L.H. Landweber" <lhl@cs.wisc.edu> Thu, 06 April 1995 02:15 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10181; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10176; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18954; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10167; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10163; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Received: from parmesan.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18912; 5 Apr 95 22:15 EDT
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 21:15:23 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "L.H. Landweber" <lhl@cs.wisc.edu>
Message-Id: <9504060215.AA01646@parmesan.cs.wisc.edu>
Received: by parmesan.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 5 Apr 95 21:15:23 -0500
To: 0001050002@mcimail.com
Subject: Re: IESG's support
Cc: bdains@linus.isoc.org, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, isoc-trustees@linus.isoc.org, lhl@cs.wisc.edu, pvm@isi.edu
vint the idea would be to bring the inet and ietf communities together. if we were to hold the meetings in consecutive time slots, it would make it difficult for people to participate in both events and would defeat this goal. we will have enough space to accommodate both in the convention center. we had to take the entire center to avoid having a show that wanted exposure to the inet attendees take the part we were not going to use. so rental of the entire facility is already included in our planned expenses. paul was in montreal when we toured the center and perhaps can comment further on the question of having enough space. on monday and tuesday, ietf would essentially have the ground to itself, modulo various workshops, small meetings, and tutorials. on wed-friday morning we would overlap. my hope is that meals and social events can be held together. some people will attend one of the meetings while others could register for both. details remain to be worked out but there is enough reason to believe that this is possible to justify continuing discussions. if anyone sees a show stopper, please shout. regards larry -------------------------- thanks, that makes some sense, although I assume you'd want to take some care in scheduling so that the IETF and INET are not completely on top of one another? Are their likely to be adequate facilities to allow the roughly 10 meetings for IETF in parallel with the 5 or so INET tracks, if the events are concurrent?
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Christian Huitema
- Re: IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Dan Lynch
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Geoff Huston
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: INET and IETF together.... Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Charles Brownstein
- Re: IESG's support L.H. Landweber
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support stev
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Tony Rutkowski
- Re: IESG's support Bev Dains
- Re: IESG's support Allison Mankin
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Tomaz Kalin
- Re: IESG's support Paul Mockapetris
- Re: IESG's support Mike O'Dell
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support John C Klensin
- Re: IESG's support Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: IESG's support Charles Brownstein
- Re: IESG's support Geoff Huston
- Re: IESG's support stev
- Re: IESG's support stev