Ballot2: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP) to Proposed Standard
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 17 March 1995 17:02 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04747; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04742; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10918; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04734; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04729; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10913; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04720; 17 Mar 95 12:02 EST
To: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Ballot2: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP) to Proposed Standard
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 12:02:18 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9503171202.aa04720@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Please return the full line with the vote. Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain Scott Bradner [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Joel Halpern [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Erik Huizer [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] John Klensin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Stev Knowles [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Allison Mankin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Paul Mockapetris [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Mike O'Dell [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Joyce K. Reynolds [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Marshall T. Rose [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Jeff Schiller [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Claudio Topolcic [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Yes => I have read the spec and know it is good stuff. No Obj => I am familiar with the protocol and believe it to be OK. Note: The ballot contains analysis from the AD which may be adequate information to vote positively. Discuss => There is something fishy that may need clarification or modification. May be considered a "no" vote. Abstain => I am not familiar with the spec, have no interest/expertise in the subject or otherwise feel obliged to skip the voting. 2/3 (8) Yes or No-Objection votes needed to pass. * Indicate reason if "Discuss". To: IETF-Announce:; Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu> Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu> Cc: ietf-ppp@merit.edu From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@cnri.reston.va.us> Subject: Protocol Action: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP) to Proposed Standard ------------- The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft "The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)" <draft-ietf-pppext-encryption-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This document is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stev Knowles and Claudio Topolcic. Technical Summary As with most CP (Control Protocol) work done by the PPP-EXT WG, this Draft allows one to negotiate the use of various link layer encryption schemes with PPP. This document does not use the often used PPP Draft template, but is readable and understandable. Working Group Summary The PPPEXT WG has been working on this Draft over the last year, and while there has been techincal discussion on various points, they seem to have reached an mutually agreeable solution to the items discussed. Protocol Quality This Draft was reviewed for the IESG by Stev Knowles, one of the Internet Area Directors, for the IESG. The last call seems to have generated no response from the community. This document was also reviewed by the Security Area Directorate.
- Ballot2: The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP… IESG Secretary