Re: One last nit

Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com> Thu, 16 March 1995 15:08 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03712; 16 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03708; 16 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07752; 16 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03694; 16 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03690; 16 Mar 95 10:07 EST
Received: from BBN.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07734; 16 Mar 95 10:07 EST
Received: from PEREGRINE.BBN.COM by BBN.COM id aa03114; 16 Mar 95 9:58 EST
Received: from peregrine.bbn.com (LOCALHOST.BBN.COM [127.0.0.1]) by peregrine.bbn.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id JAA05866; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:59:25 -0500
Message-Id: <199503161459.JAA05866@peregrine.bbn.com>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
cc: Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com>, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: One last nit
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:45:11 EST." <01HO6NW8NP1A0008IK@MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:59:23 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com>

John,
	Well, I guess you are right. I was sort of implicitly assuming
that the bullshit of the last month or so took the place of the 30 day
last call. It seems that everything that there was to debate was
debated. But I must agree. If we are to follow procedures, then we
should follow them. Then this issue is moot to me. Good luck to you.
	Claudio