Re: Dave Crocker's Appeal - goal and request for positions
stev@ftp.com Mon, 27 March 1995 19:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08838; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08834; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15852; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08826; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08822; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from wd40.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15844; 27 Mar 95 14:10 EST
Received: from ftp.com by ftp.com ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:11:11 -0500
Received: from mailserv-D.ftp.com by ftp.com ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:11:11 -0500
Received: from stev.d-cell.ftp.com by mailserv-D.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA28318; Mon, 27 Mar 95 14:09:06 EST
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:09:06 -0500
Message-Id: <9503271909.AA28318@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
To: mrose.iesg@dbc.mtview.ca.us
Subject: Re: Dave Crocker's Appeal - goal and request for positions
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: stev@ftp.com
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, dcrocker@networking.stanford.edu, iab@isi.edu, 0001050002@mcimail.com, isoc-trustees@linus.isoc.org
X-Orig-Sender: stev@mailserv-d.ftp.com
Repository: mailserv-D.ftp.com, [message accepted at Mon Mar 27 14:08:59 1995]
Originating-Client: d-cell.ftp.com
Content-Length: 2847
stop whining and get a life. but mmmaaarrrssshhhaaalll, you never let us have *any* fun . . . . if you can't stand the heat, then get off the IESG and go cry to mama. ya know, mama used to warn me about situations like this, i wish i had listened to what she had to say . . . each of you accepted the job. if you can't do it, or don't want to do it, then quit and good riddance. complete agreement. the SUN debacle is the fault of the IESG, because the IESG is responsible. the "i was one of the good germans" defense isn't credible. only the IESG is at fault? i thought it took to people to refrain from agreeing on something . . . it amazes me that, to my knowledge, there was been only one AD who hasn't put their name back up for another term. and one who didnt get returned. ahh, the freedom of having the weapon systems back on line. to me this discussion smacks of intellectual dishonesty. /mtr really, to me it smacks of whining, like you said, and of anger about being critized about refusing to not play by the rules. ps: here's a question i'm likely to ask at the Danvers' plenary. i'll tell you now so you can prepare a response (after all, i wouldn't want any of you to feel uncomfortable in public): in 100 words or less, please describe your greatest accomplishment during your tenure as an AD. use complete sentences. i helped stop marshall rose from pissing all over the process we have in the IETF, even if i disagree with the process that i was defending. i dont believe that the community wanted the IESG to change the rules when it saw fit, and to ignore the published policy that every IETF member is expected to follow. i also tried to stop marshall rose from trying to play power games and to run the IESG like he owned it. can one of the user services people tell me if all those are complete sentances? i have been playing in source code all last week, and the comments i tend to leave behind, while colorfull, are often not complete sentances. why do i get the feeling that if i ask this question, the response is going to be deafening silence from most ADs? why do i get the feeling that those ADs who do answer will do little more than (inadvertantly) provide comic relief? it may be comic relief, it may be venting of internal struggles you dont want vented, since you seem to have lost a few battles in the last year. saying no, and turning your back on the IESG didnt seem to work. too bad you didnt even have the grace to finish out your term and attend the last few iesg telechats, i enjoyed you being on them, although i am sure the reverse is not true:) farewell, marshall, it has been a trip.