Re: Revised PPP Encryption I-D
Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Sat, 18 March 1995 02:31 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13654; 17 Mar 95 21:31 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13650; 17 Mar 95 21:31 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22922; 17 Mar 95 21:31 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13642; 17 Mar 95 21:30 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13636; 17 Mar 95 21:30 EST
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22912; 17 Mar 95 21:30 EST
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id VAA11444; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 21:34:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 21:34:33 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199503180234.VAA11444@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net, scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Revised PPP Encryption I-D
I was so releived to see the changes I had asked for I forgot to look at the basic asumptions. I think John's points are a valid reason to tell Fred that there is still a problem. Scott
- Revised PPP Encryption I-D Steve Coya
- Re: Revised PPP Encryption I-D John C Klensin
- Re: Revised PPP Encryption I-D Scott Bradner