Re: One last nit
John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net> Thu, 16 March 1995 05:45 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26313; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26309; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04883; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26301; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26297; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from mail1.Reston.mci.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04878; 16 Mar 95 0:45 EST
Received: from ever (ever.jck.com) by MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET (PMDF V4.3-10 #8388) id <01HO6NW13W8G0008IK@MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET>; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:45:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 00:45:11 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
Subject: Re: One last nit
X-Sender: klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
To: Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com>, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-id: <01HO6NW8NP1A0008IK@MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET>
X-Envelope-to: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Claudio, As I told IAB Wednesday morning in another context, I don't believe a vote is possible at the next telechat. Assuming the "does this agreement conform to RFC 1602" hurdle is crossed, our normal procedures still require us to issue a Last Call and then wait at least a couple of weeks before voting. I would assume that the question of "is this really worthwhile without NFS" would come up during the Last Call discussion and, since the AD and Area that hosted the relevant WG are long gone, I would assume that we would need to find a forum and relevant body to discuss the topic. I just see no other alternative, unless we are to adopt a new metarule that says "anything that gets stalled for two years is automatically entitled to elevation to Proposed Standard". If Dave doesn't like that, let him appeal it. The procedures are, in this case, pretty clear. john
- One last nit Claudio Topolcic
- Re: One last nit God Almighty
- Re: One last nit Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: One last nit Scott Bradner
- Re: One last nit John C Klensin
- Re: God, etc.... Mike O'Dell
- Re: One last nit Joel Halpern
- Re: One last nit Steve Coya
- Re: One last nit Claudio Topolcic
- Re: One last nit Steve Coya
- Re: One last nit Claudio Topolcic
- Re: One last nit John C Klensin
- Re: One last nit John C Klensin
- Re: One last nit Steve Coya
- Re: One last nit Steve Coya
- Re: One last nit John C Klensin
- Re: One last nit Steve Coya
- Re: One last nit Scott Bradner