Re: IP Security......

Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu> Mon, 20 March 1995 04:10 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10484; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10480; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15367; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10473; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10469; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15362; 19 Mar 95 23:10 EST
Received: from aloha.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-17) id <AA21725>; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 20:10:36 -0800
Message-Id: <199503200410.AA21725@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net>
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Reply-To: pvm@isi.edu
Subject: Re: IP Security......
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:37:49 -0500. <QQyhva22852.199503200337@rodan.UU.NET>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 20:09:39 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Mockapetris <pvm@isi.edu>

> do we have to publish an informational when we know there
> is IETF working group activity and it is clearly an end run?
> 
> if they take it to the WG and get rebuffed somehow and *then*
> want to publish an informational, then I'd lead the choir,
> but to do so ab initio without trying the WG path....
> 
> at least we could *suggest* they take it to the working group????
> 
> 	-mo

Better yet, we could make them have it critiqued by Bill Simpson
first.

I can live with your route.

paul
 
USC/Information Sciences Institute      phone: 310-822-1511 x285
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA  fax:   310-823-6714
90292