Re: TMUX BOF/WG at Seattle?

Pete Cameron <cameron@xylint.co.uk> Thu, 24 February 1994 11:16 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01103; 24 Feb 94 6:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01099; 24 Feb 94 6:16 EST
Received: from basil.xylint.co.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03521; 24 Feb 94 6:16 EST
Received: by basil.xylint.co.uk (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA27486; Thu, 24 Feb 94 10:42:28 GMT
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 10:42:28 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Pete Cameron <cameron@xylint.co.uk>
Message-Id: <9402241042.AA27486@basil.xylint.co.uk>
To: cmp-id@xylint.co.uk, marjo%hpindyo.cup.hp.com@hpl.hp.co.uk
Subject: Re: TMUX BOF/WG at Seattle?
Cc: Sun-Kwan_Kimn%hp6600.desk.hp.com@hpl.hp.co.uk

---------  Received message begins Here  ---------

> From: "Marjo F. Mercado" <marjo%hpindyo.cup.hp.com@hpl.hp.co.uk>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Are there any plans to hold a BOF or a WG meeting at Seattle IETF?
> 
> Didn't see any in the draft agenda.

Marjo,

Currently there are no plans to hold a session.  The feeling
is that we discussed this well enough in Houston, and that
the next stage will be a final release of the draft, with a
last call notice issued by the Transport Area.  I hope to do
this last draft soon (before Seattle?).  We have talked to
Allison Mankin the area director, and she agrees with this
approach. [Allison, please correct me if I got this wrong].

If anyone disagrees with this, please let us know, as it is
not too late to schedule a meeting.

Pete