Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-to-be
jkrey@isi.edu Thu, 16 March 1995 17:05 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06168; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06164; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10088; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06143; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06139; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10056; 16 Mar 95 12:05 EST
Received: from akamai.isi.edu by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-21) id <AA23285>; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:05:16 -0800
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:06:31 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: jkrey@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:06:31 -0800
Message-Id: <199503161706.AA02054@akamai.isi.edu>
Received: by akamai.isi.edu (5.65c/4.0.3-4) id <AA02054>; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 09:06:31 -0800
To: iesg@isi.edu
Subject: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-to-be
Cc: rfc-editor@isi.edu
Folks, The RFC Editor has received this Experimental RFC-to-be submission from Bill Simpson. Is this kosher to the IESG? Joyce and --jon. ----- Begin Included Message ----- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 95 22:48:14 GMT From: "William Allen Simpson" <bsimpson@morningstar.com> To: rfc-editor@ISI.EDU Subject: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages In accordance with communcations with the DNSIND WG Chair, and an IPng Area Director, I will be submitting an Experimental Protocol for publication. I will send you nroff and text, per usual. > From: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) > Subject: Re: Proposed or Experimental? > > I will propose it to the group as experimental. This may help deflect heat > from Bill, though that might dissapoint him. :-) > > > I will say that if this type of thing is not agreed to it does complicate > > some of the IPng autoconfiguration issues. > > I suspect that it may not be that Bill's proposal is itself disliked. It > may be that a bunch of issues including SIG security may be causing folk to > be reluctant to let go of the in-addr.arpa (or v6.int or whatever) zone. > From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> > Bill has a point, this would have to be redone for IPv6 and thus currently > refers to IPv4 - as such I'd support it going to Experimental now and > still have the general topic brought up in Danvers to see if it should be > further explored for IPv6. > It should be exactly identical for v6, but have different ICMP types. Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu ----- End Included Message -----
- Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-to-be jkrey
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… Steve Coya
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… postel
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… jkrey
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… Scott Bradner
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… stev
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… William Allen Simpson
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… Paul Mockapetris
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… Scott Bradner
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… Paul Mockapetris
- Re: Experimental ICMP Domain Name messages - RFC-… IESG Secretary