Re: Where are we?

Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Tue, 28 March 1995 22:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15299; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15295; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21489; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15287; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15279; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21481; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15268; 28 Mar 95 17:43 EST
To: mankin@isi.edu
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, vcerf@mci.com, iab@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Where are we?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 95 19:24:45 PST." <199503280324.AA10896@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 95 17:43:42 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9503281743.aa15268@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Allison,

I haven't heard [yet] that both parties have signed the nth final
version :-) of the agreement.

>> And use the IETF hallway time to see if we can get on
>> with some aspect of the second half of the WG's charter
>> (looking at the current technology's limitations and
>> what evolution is possible under IETF engineering aegis).

No reason why these conversations can't take place.

Steve