IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 12 June 2015 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cnit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cnit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88771AC43B for <cnit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrfeuSvU0skQ for <cnit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348061AC437 for <cnit@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655AABE64; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:17:17 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9SN_uFYSFRo; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:17:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [129.6.253.25] (unknown [129.6.253.25]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EB07BE54; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:17:10 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <557AE9E4.5030205@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:17:08 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>, "cnit@ietf.org" <cnit@ietf.org>
References: <D19F23AD.26CEA%richard@shockey.us> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365603614617@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <9588_1434045613_5579CCAD_9588_574_1_fki5dyxdmgyv92b6hugpfuoy.1434045608655@email.android.com> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D354C94@fcc.gov> <9384_1434103912_557AB068_9384_7221_1_B5939C6860701C49AA39C5DA5189448B14C216E0@OPEXCLILM42.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>, <D1A05A04.26E84%richard@shockey.us> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D355543@fcc.gov>
In-Reply-To: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D355543@fcc.gov>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cnit/_5sOBwZKv5Gf-rDFJ1-YDG4NhlM>
Subject: Re: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..
X-BeenThere: cnit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calling Name Identity Trust discussion list <cnit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cnit>, <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cnit/>
List-Post: <mailto:cnit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cnit>, <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:17:21 -0000


On 12/06/15 15:13, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> In almost all cases of interest, the calling party *wants* to
> disclose accurate information to the called party, so the privacy
> issues don't seem to arise. They would only arise if there was forced
> disclosure; I don't think anybody is proposing that.

Privacy issues could also arise if a middlebox could now see
sensitive information that it previously could not see. I think
that is independent of whether disclosure is desired by either
of the endpoints.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email