IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Sun, 14 June 2015 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: cnit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cnit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701F21A896C for <cnit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 07:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvN_PiwDbiyp for <cnit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 07:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.248.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B741A8966 for <cnit@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 07:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16089 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jun 2015 14:55:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by qproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2015 14:55:58 -0000
Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmgw3 with id gLUu1q00w1MNPNq01LUxs0; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:29:06 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=K/SxQUmI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:117 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=j1VUBDpLDLYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=ZZnuYtJkoWoA:10 a=8WrITzYgnNwA:10 a=-h4zUWlAkX4A:10 a=XAFQembCKUMA:10 a=z9tbli-vAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=V2tbnXzNJl_QKNLKy9EA:9 a=hGY4H5oG8KYgw0kz:21 a=mH9SIRAf-OHzb-j1:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:CC:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=0ExX50eO19tLDRUCM0WvujYzahc0g9/DsLYC/VhSueI=; b=O/FNLIBVW0A7mD5rNucd6mTYmNB39Z+SBa2przI4fpVHqfjKr48J/RtysspIQd3FmA5KxOoAmQzQvAHJ3e7NFwhywteVOS10/KOwdrgVXuQ67FkjmBX5+xFkFRbrb/1e;
Received: from [108.56.131.149] (port=53037 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1Z490k-0004yE-PH; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:35:47 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.1.150515
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:35:43 -0400
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
Message-ID: <D1A30876.270C3%richard@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..
References: <D19F23AD.26CEA%richard@shockey.us> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365603614617@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <9588_1434045613_5579CCAD_9588_574_1_fki5dyxdmgyv92b6hugpfuoy.1434045608655@email.android.com> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D354C94@fcc.gov> <9384_1434103912_557AB068_9384_7221_1_B5939C6860701C49AA39C5DA5189448B14C216E0@OPEXCLILM42.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D1A05A04.26E84%richard@shockey.us> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D355543@fcc.gov> <557AE9E4.5030205@cs.tcd.ie> <D1A0761F.26EE1%richard@shockey.us> <15E9AA29-E9F1-4DA6-ADA4-E201F8F07B7A@brianrosen.net> <2B0F677F0B95454297753F58D4A07FA30279326B72@FHDP1LUMXC7V31.us.one.verizon.com> <53A932AB-5E5D-41C0-895F-21EC1D4B17D5@brianrosen.net> <2B0F677F0B95454297753F58D4A07FA30279326CB7@FHDP1LUMXC7V31.us.one.verizon.com> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D3558A5@fcc.gov> <D1A0FC51.26FA9%richard@shockey.us> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D35C25C@fcc.gov>
In-Reply-To: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D35C25C@fcc.gov>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 108.56.131.149 authed with richard+shockey.us}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cnit/cfy9E0BFcDj9zx-1JeARt7VWuc4>
Cc: "cnit@ietf.org" <cnit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..
X-BeenThere: cnit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calling Name Identity Trust discussion list <cnit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cnit>, <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cnit/>
List-Post: <mailto:cnit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cnit>, <mailto:cnit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:56:03 -0000

On 6/14/15, 10:01 AM, "Henning Schulzrinne" <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
wrote:

>The VoLTE/IMS experts listening probably know this better, but judging
>from some quick Googling of sample VoLTE call flows, SIP display name
>information is already part of the IMS/VoLTE standards, so model #1 (NNI)
>shouldn't be that hard, and we can then build on that, as you hint at.

Agreed.  Its how the mobile CUA deals with the INVITE that contains the
data it that is very unclear to me.  That is ultimately a issue 3GPP GSMA
or US GSMA should know something about.

>
>I suspect we all agree that the barrier to entry should be minimal. We
>can discuss, for example, whether a by-reference or by-value mechanism is
>better, or we need both.

Agreed.  


>
>________________________________________
>From: Richard Shockey [richard@shockey.us]
>Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 9:29 PM
>To: Henning Schulzrinne; Dwight, Timothy M (Tim); Brian Rosen
>Cc: philippe.fouquart@orange.com; cnit@ietf.org; Stephen Farrell; Ben
>Campbell
>Subject: Re: [cnit] CNIT Charter bashing..
>
>Henning the biggest issue is that any form of advanced CNAM display is not
>currently applicable to the the mobile access devices. Which are now
>finally over 50% of the NANP even if you consider BYOD in the enterprise.
>Yea that is another use case.
>
>Hence the issue with Apple. This is ultimately a problem with that will
>have to be coordinated with US GSMA or GSMA generally.
>
>Or IMHO with the the 8th floor on 12th st. It really is a jawboning use.
>Tom needs to call Tim Cook or Larry Page and make the ask.
>
>I do reject Brians pretense here. Given the IETF context perfection is
>actually the enemy of deployment.
>
>I want a charter that is simple and clear.  Header and object. Period.  If
>that is impossible then Š..
>
>Its time the AD¹s decide.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cnit mailing list
>cnit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cnit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email