Re: [codec] draft-ietf-codec-oggopus and "album" gain

Ron <ron@debian.org> Wed, 27 August 2014 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF961A0722 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJr6hmSPi1L5 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE971A02A3 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp121-45-6-245.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO mailservice.shelbyville.oz) ([121.45.6.245]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2014 06:57:08 +0930
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailservice.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25935FFF44; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:56:56 +0930 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailservice.shelbyville.oz
Received: from mailservice.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailservice.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EFys3qx0dRxo; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:56:55 +0930 (CST)
Received: from hex.shelbyville.oz (hex.shelbyville.oz [192.168.1.6]) by mailservice.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9502FFFD70; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:56:55 +0930 (CST)
Received: by hex.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85E0C80470; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:56:55 +0930 (CST)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:56:55 +0930
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
Message-ID: <20140827212655.GW326@hex.shelbyville.oz>
References: <20140813222201.54fe7910@crunchbang> <53ECF0E0.9060308@xiph.org> <20140816040140.GA31682@hex.shelbyville.oz> <53FBC299.1070008@thaumas.net> <20140827153043.2ff5e031@crunchbang> <53FE0054.5080207@thaumas.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53FE0054.5080207@thaumas.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/-RFfc1zMGbtB4taaBv_XhdeSpeA
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] draft-ietf-codec-oggopus and "album" gain
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:27:10 -0000

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 08:59:16AM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
> 
> "Implementations of this specification MUST respect the 'output gain'
> field, but MAY NOT respect the comments. Encoder authors are advised to
> take this into account. For example, it is more robust for a
> post-processing application to performing track normalization to update
> the 'output gain' field and write a comment 'R128_TRACK_GAIN=0' than to
> put the normalization value directly in the comment."

s/to performing/performing/ ?  Or maybe "that is performing"?

But yeah, modulo whatever still seems to be misleading Ian,
that seems about right to me.

  Ron