Re: [codec] #21: Supporting Wireless Links?

stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com> Sat, 01 May 2010 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CD03A68EA for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 04:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxJfLN6tlSn7 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 04:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6393A68C4 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2010 04:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so760189wyb.31 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 May 2010 04:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sk2Bqy+2fZ3x17I9EFpsAnHhc7uEj+X5bx4+HZVx1ZI=; b=ofpHKSQo+t0f/JIo+9SQJOfVb3K/8b32Zrd4sDpFrQoGmG4XMbwiH53syiuq4Rqsux uPOfr8PfFqPawQSEYct06o3YVZUuYBcOVVYMJsqiV7Ck389RoRCLK9x0mnoi5WWGqZNG cBhgct346jYeasjsaNDIc87FrsrBReYxS3T2A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BwNOaQyHfegYxGb21uRkAZk5sd7b7bW34vshCVMmQ5oCCOIK63ygw4iz/e/KAcnBMp 2sAhns4u2JJlnhbeLsbW1y57pS1SYObmij7zaofV38tEdNx0CpAs7kUdDcNigc7lqttB DbM+xxxZQ+ftNeuxFKMpDe7QdnnkLsC9vGdIE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.87.194 with SMTP id y44mr3509647wee.157.1272713680416; Sat, 01 May 2010 04:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.28.139 with HTTP; Sat, 1 May 2010 04:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <062.a00b15332f6e9da39f0d81d14d24c64d@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.a00b15332f6e9da39f0d81d14d24c64d@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 07:34:40 -0400
Message-ID: <w2u6e9223711005010434g92076f80y2b6734b2411a9e6c@mail.gmail.com>
From: stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
To: codec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d56693d27274048586becc"
Subject: Re: [codec] #21: Supporting Wireless Links?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 11:34:59 -0000

Bluetooth is clearly out-of-scope for this group.

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:50 AM, codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>wrote:

> #21: Supporting Wireless Links?
>
> ------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  hoene@…                 |       Owner:
>     Type:  defect                  |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:
> Component:  requirements            |     Version:
>  Severity:  -                       |    Keywords:
>
> ------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
>  Will Wireless IP be considered as important? What is about supporting
>  Bluetooth headsets?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/21>
> codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
>