Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps
"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Tue, 23 April 2013 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B082121F934B for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K64VG8XePi5b for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E01B21F9347 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.250.6.54] (unknown [63.245.220.240]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE97AF21B9; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5177045F.4050002@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:59:59 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.16.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <00f801ce3ff7$354e29b0$9fea7d10$@uni-tuebingen.de> <20130423193100.GA29460@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BLU0-SMTP253460B99C4D6CE07CE75CD0B40@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP253460B99C4D6CE07CE75CD0B40@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cs.wg2.qualinet@listes.epfl.ch
Subject: Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:00:01 -0000
Paul Coverdale wrote: > test should do. It should have been done as part of the IETF codec WG > activity, but better late than never. With my chair hat on: Last I checked, this was still a WG, and we still have a milestone to publish test results (though we are admittedly late!). As we depend on volunteers to conduct those tests, I think we all share the desire for any testing which does get done to be as useful as possible. Let's try to focus on that goal.
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Ron
- [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Paul Coverdale
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Paul Coverdale
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Ron
- Re: [codec] Audio tests: Further steps Christian Hoene