Re: [codec] Testing, requirements, and IETF process
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 19 April 2011 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09AEE06E9 for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-tR1cTYvv26 for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04211E0691 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1020; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1303224992; x=1304434592; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rn7iJcOlKblytkhuV+wpPBQcGPY9559MX2m4mWWWItM=; b=Dpe8VMAn2STJlLx9zzNj06KaEshMaFCyEFbBU6OU35OENBszcoyNaVZC lupS9gWq/1Vc9nyGsMJs9KXefB0bIZsG22NKiXWNo8smwSohOhC/JxEd/ 1Qvnjtv01Hbfg/QdjPzQ9PT7DeH+iAlxvMNPFy/DfcSSTEOpfPzq98k6Z s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAC2hrU2rRDoI/2dsb2JhbAClK3eIb58knGeFcQSFZ4ggg3w
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,240,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="432826288"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2011 14:56:31 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3JEuUQK003143; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:56:30 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC8BE3@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:56:31 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6FE0E5C8-218C-4636-83E6-41075BC235B3@cisco.com>
References: <8FDB3712-6A59-4E6E-872B-B69C4E574257@cisco.com> <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC8BE3@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
To: Anisse Taleb <Anisse.Taleb@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] Testing, requirements, and IETF process
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:56:32 -0000
Yah, I agree. On Apr 18, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Anisse Taleb wrote: > Dear Cullen, > >> deploying. I think there are several points that many people would agree >> with > > Not quite, the wording is somewhat misleading, I do not wish to be picky, but I would like that the statements made are as correct as possible. > >> >> 1) test results are good >> > The results presented so far are good, the actual tests however are debatable. > >> 2) understanding how a test was done and being able to reproduce it >> increases the confidence in test results > > Agreed ! > >> >> 3) we can't delay forever doing testing >> > > Testing is not delaying the process, it is part of the process. The topic of testing has been raised at the CODEC BoF and individuals present at that meeting and in support of the creation of the WG admitted to this fact. > >> >> 4) perfection is the enemy of good >> > So is imperfection. > >
- [codec] Testing, requirements, and IETF process Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] Testing, requirements, and IETF proce… Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Testing, requirements, and IETF proce… Cullen Jennings