Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC

Hello,

In this draft, the editors of draft are not named as editors but as authors.
Thus, I would suggest to follow the example given in
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5620.txt and add an ", Ed." behind the
names. A list of authors is given in the acknowledgement section of the
draft.

With best regards,

 Christian Hoene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of The IESG
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:24 PM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: codec@ietf.org
> Subject: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec
> Requirements) to Informational RFC
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec
> WG
> (codec) to consider the following document:
> - 'Codec Requirements'
>   <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> as an Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-06-30. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This document provides specific requirements for an Internet audio
>    codec.  These requirements address quality, sampling rate, bit-rate,
>    and packet loss robustness, as well as other desirable properties.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec