Re: [codec] #14: VAD and CNG?

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Mon, 24 May 2010 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BC53A6BC8 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.330, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWvv7vwGAbSe for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (mx05.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34F63A6B03 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoeneT60 ([82.113.121.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o4OHbFSM001345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 May 2010 19:37:23 +0200
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Brian Rosen' <br@brianrosen.net>
References: <000101cafb5a$37c5f8b0$a751ea10$@de> <C8202910.35866%br@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <C8202910.35866%br@brianrosen.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 19:37:11 +0200
Message-ID: <002301cafb67$c3dc5300$4b94f900$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acr7WTQ0TWNTp065pEyGl+SXCIY/ggAAB+/wAAJXcJIAAQwYkA==
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus-Spam-Check: clean (checked by Avira MailGate: version: 3.0.0-4; spam filter version: 3.0.0/2.0; host: mx05)
X-AntiVirus: checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.0.0-4; AVE: 8.2.1.242; VDF: 7.10.7.163; host: mx05); id=17691-KoC1vn
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] #14: VAD and CNG?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:37:38 -0000

Hi Brian,

>I'll be happy to go into the details, but phones may not know they are in an
>emergency call.  No phone knows this today.  There is some proposed
>signaling that would tell them, IF the phone, and the service provider
>implement it, but even then, there are circumstances where the phone won't
>know.

If(called.number==112 || called.number==911 || called.number=XYZ) 
	EmergencyCall();

See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-1-2
It is so easy to know... I do not get your arguments.

With best regards,

 Christian