IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz?

Michael Knappe <mknappe@juniper.net> Fri, 16 April 2010 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mknappe@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150233A69DB for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.590, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpeRvCbDkUdD for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD7A3A69E7 for <codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKS8iQyrDrCUXOoB3ZJBr05WXclwXJ0afH@postini.com; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:31:14 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::a124:1ab1:8e0b:f671%11]) with mapi; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:28:52 -0700
From: Michael Knappe <mknappe@juniper.net>
To: Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org>, stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:28:49 -0700
Thread-Topic: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz?
Thread-Index: Acrdaav4TjSSU61QQsCphiZ7/dngNQAGDisj
Message-ID: <C7EDDE51.14830%mknappe@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <08DE0B70-F3AA-4DCA-8662-DE88155DE016@freeswitch.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.3.0.091002
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:31:40 -0000

I agree as well, let's stick to the 48 kHz family and its common divisors.
Here's an interesting blurb on the origins of the 44.1 kHz sample rate and
its choice for the CD format.

http://www.cardinalpeak.com/blog/?p=150

Mike


On 4/16/10 6:28 AM, "Brian West" <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:

> I agree these sampling rates shouldn't be a requirement.
> 
> /b
> 
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:52 AM, stephen botzko wrote:
> 
>> - I see no requirement for 44.1 kHz (or 22.05, 11.025).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email