Re: [codec] Tonal language: Cantonese...

Anisse Taleb <Anisse.Taleb@huawei.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Anisse.Taleb@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C4E21F8B8F for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdN1Qq5BgIsP for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrga04-in.huawei.com (lhrga04-in.huawei.com [195.33.106.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E60521F8B6D for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lhrga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPR000TWTEES7@lhrga04-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:51:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LHREML201-EDG.china.huawei.com ([172.18.7.118]) by lhrga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPR00GHFTED0V@lhrga04-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:51:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.31) by LHREML201-EDG.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:51:39 +0100
Received: from LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::f93f:958b:5b06:4f36]) by LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:51:48 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:51:48 +0000
From: Anisse Taleb <Anisse.Taleb@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <004d01cc5817$df78f4c0$9e6ade40$@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Originating-IP: [172.18.7.193]
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>, 'Steve Underwood' <steveu@coppice.org>, "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Message-id: <6A58A83F7040374B9FB4EEEDBD835512A1B8B4@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Thread-topic: [codec] Tonal language: Cantonese...
Thread-index: AcxYF9dxV0TyUFQaSzOGB0CHxvVrfgAJocGD
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <004d01cc5817$df78f4c0$9e6ade40$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Subject: Re: [codec] Tonal language: Cantonese...
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:51:21 -0000

Dear Christian,

Excellent: 非常好
Good:好
Fair:一般
Poor:较差
Bad:差

when it comes to MOS, there is a difference between ACR, DCR etc...could you be more specific ?
Listener instructions need also to be in Chinese I assume.

Kind regards,
/Anisse
________________________________________
From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [codec-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Christian Hoene [hoene@uni-tuebingen.de]
Sent: 11 August 2011 13:14
To: 'Steve Underwood'; codec@ietf.org
Subject: [codec]  Tonal language: Cantonese...

Hello,

Some more questions. If you speak of Cantonese, are you meaning the dialect
of "Yue"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_Chinese

Does anybody is aware of Cantonese full-band test signals that I can use for
the MUSHRA tests?

Does anybody have the five Chinese categories used for MUSHRA and MOS
scales?

Thanks

 Christian


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Dr.-Ing. Christian Hoene, University of Tübingen, Computer Science, Chair of
Communication Networks, Research Group Interactive Communication Systems
(ICS)
Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, Tel +49 7071 2970532,
www.net.uni-tuebingen.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Steve Underwood
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:41 PM
> To: codec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [codec] Tonal language: Punjabi?
>
> On 08/05/2011 11:21 PM, Christian Hoene wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > would it make sense to do testing with the tonal language Punjabi
instead
> or
> > in addition to Chinese?
> > We have a same Pakistan and Indian friends here, which can do the
testing.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Christian
> >
> Be more specific. If you are interested in tonal performance you need to
> test with Cantonese. All Chinese languages have a tonal element, but the
> importance of tone in Cantonese is much higher than in, say, Mandarin.
>
> I've heard than Vietnamese is another language with an important tonal
> element, but I have no personal experience.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec

_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
codec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec