Re: [codec] requirements #19 (new): How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay / frame size depended processing delay?
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Tue, 25 January 2011 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1923A69C0 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCyJgaTdjdlS for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1620E3A69BF for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1PhWfT-0003UD-AY; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:21:55 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:21:55 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19#comment:6
Message-ID: <071.65983ca30d23dd315c68da04961acb9e@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.f8b0d2abf056a9655a81ee25366bb354@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 19
In-Reply-To: <062.f8b0d2abf056a9655a81ee25366bb354@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] requirements #19 (new): How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay / frame size depended processing delay?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: codec@ietf.org
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:19:00 -0000
#19: How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay /
frame size depended processing delay?
Comment(by gmaxwell@…):
There was a large amount of interesting discussion on this subject, but I
don't believe that any of it was moving in the direction of creating
requirements language beyond narrowing our existing latency requirements.
I believe there was ultimately no consensus to further narrow the latency
requirements beyond what was established in the current requirements
document and, accordingly, no further action is required on this
particular ticket.
--
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hoene@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19#comment:6>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #19 (new): How large is … codec issue tracker