Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates?

"Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu> Tue, 13 April 2010 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B121228C16A for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIlUC66n4arG for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us17.unix.fas.harvard.edu (us17.unix.fas.harvard.edu [140.247.35.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41563A68F7 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us17.unix.fas.harvard.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by us17.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7535041E226; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mail; bh=0Of2vOTv/fJUrFs Z21cmS7Rb5sFJjGi/T/5YDNRCQxk=; b=eVpNBxJElpmf030LoXGjmuLr1E/L17p HXzhhm01fZU/JjTmr7eyUjd77iK6TZoPMp2YM1VnbOILdR79ta+HpvAMrgMW//wI b8zNbx/WckbpQQXHJ8DYoD4PU2Zj1AzzQDG3GBw1Lll8hrvStSDEOf5gvzt/DwKg py0KXPHuqqnY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=mail; b=Ki0lrJKRq PHCNf+xHk8GSseZkw7Hc+KEZCcaqeTKw/CP3+5pQi2qpPnDmCrsKr36bTxBkIgeq t4gpJ+aWfhe1ZjVTjExsci/hzkkh0z4MSkB0HjQ6MMso0b59tAe1yB1hrSwNJ4V3 NA2vlOk2fMYMsNcv3L/1oi7PZgtzTDaXDg=
Received: from [172.23.141.66] (bwhmaincampuspat25.partners.org [170.223.207.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bmschwar@fas) by us17.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C27C41E21D; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BC4BF26.9060008@fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0400
From: "Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091019)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
References: <062.89d7aa91c79b145b798b83610e45ce71@tools.ietf.org> <4BC4586F.1010709@digium.com> <o2u6e9223711004130620lb04d335auaafacfa34b0d6fe7@mail.gmail.com> <001e01cadb17$886fcec0$994f6c40$@de> <v2p6e9223711004130756p52726f8bo2db445e749ffe662@mail.gmail.com> <003101cadb1c$828b3990$87a1acb0$@de> <j2l6e9223711004130926nfaa975e3y129cc8cc21c52a84@mail.gmail.com> <m2v28bf2c661004130941g2e2bf956ld512b5d162df9080@mail.gmail.com> <g2h6e9223711004131029m3bfeb1ddq1a0e2bbd8418102f@mail.gmail.com> <m2s28bf2c661004131111pd7880c03m5f225ad464819414@mail.gmail.com> <s2i6e9223711004131143v3f3d2123pc94fe430a59b5776@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <s2i6e9223711004131143v3f3d2123pc94fe430a59b5776@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAEAF8703DED36F7F839D1C0E"
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bens@alum.mit.edu
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:00:09 -0000

stephen botzko wrote:
> Fullband is (IMHO) a specsmanship thing for speech (and probably for music
> also for most of us).  Though it may not be that hard to get it, if we are
> shooting for superwideband anyway.

I think scaling up to fullband and total transparency is important, so
that we never have to do this* again.

--Ben

*: "this" being standardizing a low-latency audio codec.  Of course, we
can do this again if we want to, but we have an opportunity to be somewhat
"future-proof", and we might as well take it.