Re: [codec] requirements #10 (new): Multi-channel frame ordering?
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Mon, 24 January 2011 23:54 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F043A69B6 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:54:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAxd2y2IppHh for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D261E3A69B5 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1PhWHd-0002a8-45; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:57:17 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: gmaxwell@juniper.net
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:57:17 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/10#comment:1
Message-ID: <071.e51df8d21863b2af0863d79457572513@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.5924fe56212099d2fdb86d57ea18cfe0@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 10
In-Reply-To: <062.5924fe56212099d2fdb86d57ea18cfe0@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] requirements #10 (new): Multi-channel frame ordering?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: codec@ietf.org
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:54:21 -0000
#10: Multi-channel frame ordering?
Comment(by gmaxwell@…):
I believe this is a primarily codec design question. E.g. How the bits are
written onto the wire.
The requirements draft covers our multichannel requirements in some of the
applications sections (e.g. 2.3) and in Section 5.5.
I believe that we can either close this ticket or convert it to a ticket
regarding the Opus draft.
--
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hoene@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/10#comment:1>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #10: Multi-channel frame ordering? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #10 (new): Multi-channel… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #10: Multi-channel frame ordering? codec issue tracker