Re: [codec] comparitive quality testing

Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com> Tue, 19 April 2011 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6589E06B0 for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUFQ2B4xFLMt for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C878E06AE for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so4435698wwa.13 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=V3wb/AczM6XskggNdTjHH/CRkgzda9GaqWXHaFVAIbE=; b=At927Z9CyG/dkA8eS3FFnkQh5g3G5HcZ4IpVOdH26V0twuuILfxcjimacKjGcfRgF5 NyghxQ+YFbNhsI/DOkHKHxxXO/b9sYTf5TZRZ0OfKPTFVXPZyFveurYEMqtc7Yq34kDn aXVbLM0TIocEGjMvBrHT2wDvV6hWa95NcjRZc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=J5kn/lS3vrtSBJOYW/o0k+ywS7huGhrTY2MxOZx+olAxbZpCIgq9ljIgrs6YeHMZjq 7Y6+/yiC+vCtqBieP7y/XHSOyJ2kfsKi30evfaaooRYKpbl4LcF9is3qlggMbk/F7DDB /n77LiCJxyoZvglIkNlWWRxdenHWxOivFwBq8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.209.8 with SMTP id ge8mr5962581wbb.211.1303200338164; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.69 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC8BB1@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <BCB3F026FAC4C145A4A3330806FEFDA93BA8B64643@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC8BB1@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:05:37 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikaZCNSin76Ry5y+nDEXOJR65P_fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com>
To: Anisse Taleb <anisse.taleb@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] comparitive quality testing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:05:39 -0000

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Anisse Taleb <anisse.taleb@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The market can figure out the comparative quality question on its own.
>>
>
> What is even more funny, is that now we see more arguments against having a standard at all.

Non-standards are not even part of the market.

Monty