Re: [codec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-valin-codec-opus-update-00.txt

Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7237A21F999C for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SBcQXHxTst4 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021B421F90AC for <codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (modemcable130.97-201-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.97.130]) (Authenticated sender: jvalin@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D60F236E; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <522A25D8.1090109@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:58:32 -0400
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tina le Grand <tina.legrand@webrtc.org>
References: <20130712222833.13138.87216.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51E0BDE1.9020901@jmvalin.ca> <51FA7C61.3080704@xiph.org> <CAKsXFw5PVWWKm0i9J27OhGZPfE3pzVKAcT3xCiMdma=2fBzL9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKsXFw5PVWWKm0i9J27OhGZPfE3pzVKAcT3xCiMdma=2fBzL9w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-valin-codec-opus-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:59:03 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tina,

Thanks for the feedback. I'll make the changes.

> * Section 6. Can you describe how to remove the 180-degree phase
> shift?

Not sure what part of my explanation isn't clear. What happens is that
the encoder has a per-band "inversion flag" it can use for intensity
stereo and when the decoder sees that flag, it flips the sign of the
right channel to make it 180-degrees out of phase with the left
channel. The proposal is simply to make the inversion step optional on
the decoder side, even when the flag is set by the encoder. Any
suggestion on how to fix the current text?

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc

> Thanks, Tina le Grand.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry
> <tterribe@xiph.org <mailto:tterribe@xiph.org>> wrote:
> 
> Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> 
> See these proposed fixes to the Opus RFC. These are minor changes
> to the normative part of the reference implementation.
> 
> 
> With my chair hat on:
> 
> Although JDR originally said we would handle updates to RFC 6716 
> through the normal errata process [1], after conferring with our 
> ADs, we decided to do them via a new draft, so that there was no 
> question about overriding working group consensus.
> 
> To that end, we'd like to run a consensus call to add a milestone 
> for doing these updates. It would be helpful to have reviews of
> this document before doing that call. I propose we allow a month
> (until Sep. 1) for such reviews, and then run the call.
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/__documents/LIAISON/liaison-__2012-09-21-codec-isoiec-jtc-__1sc-29wg-11-liaison-from-ietf-__codec-working-group-to-isoiec-__regarding-speech-and-audio-__coding-standardization-__attachment-1.pdf
>
> 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2012-09-21-codec-isoiec-jtc-1sc-29wg-11-liaison-from-ietf-codec-working-group-to-isoiec-regarding-speech-and-audio-coding-standardization-attachment-1.pdf>
> 
> _________________________________________________ codec mailing
> list codec@ietf.org <mailto:codec@ietf.org> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/codec 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ codec mailing list 
> codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKiXYAAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9lxsH/RqmAGCEoVvPedtlFsXQ24h7
rOtg7VREBlKaEanpmq0atSjSwz+chbNxIkqkjAKRiLQTWpWxR5r98XxZJNM3PAZr
v/O4unDTG0KvIzu8mpqOsetsCGzfnMKxp3K1yxTx0vB6Bo0WNSNLK3GSqPX98ofC
XG1jt2KztKolnvOUiB99X2HEjRook0igQZb1WyEGAXsvws0tYTfmetOTg5fEcgKu
mLnzpTVygDqu1xEPtZFbBusKodzu4hwwzHgTrVIkeHLFHXs7Fwbwc7db5+k1K+Ni
iFT/JGIcXL6ZQ0TPXBmzQJ429NkVtLzH2BqewOSFQiGKqrij42AfctZIdg1uPQM=
=up2q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----