Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-07

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Sun, 24 July 2011 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6446D21F8BDC for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjXvaSNnFWU0 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (mx05.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E89421F8BD9 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoeneT60 (vpn0003.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.164.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p6O1i9Rv011401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:44:11 +0200
From: "Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: "'Jonathan Rosenberg'" <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>, "'Cullen Jennings'" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <D0DF9C6A-8344-46CF-A8E3-E2BA90EC2149@cisco.com> <4E26B5E3.8070107@jdrosen.net> <000001cc4920$4a72cb40$df5861c0$@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <000001cc4920$4a72cb40$df5861c0$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:44:12 +0200
Organization: =?us-ascii?Q?Universitat_Tubingen?=
Message-ID: <000001cc49a3$328ed4a0$97ac7de0$@uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFOUk2kP0tGJJ09CpDYe0yRa+4pcwLeI0CdAfYuoRGVz68zgA==
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus: NOT checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.2.1.23; host: mx05)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-opus-07
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 01:44:18 -0000

> Hi,
> 
> I went through the draft and parts of the source code and it seems that
> WGLC
> is quite too early.
> 
> Some text in the draft is hardly understandable if at all, the source code
> has some (minor) bugs, and the codec supports things that should be done
in
> the payload such as frame and a feature called "padding".
> 
> Does anybody beside me review the drafts or the code at all (I mean beside
> the authors)?
> 
> More emails are to come or shall I use the track again. Hopefully, it
would
[Christian Hoene] not - really not - 
> take a year again to get the issues fixed.
> 
> Christian
>