Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing

Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca> Wed, 06 April 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE773A69C5 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-r8dVjq4WAv for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s37.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s37.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.112]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD273A693E for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP101 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s37.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:59:07 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [70.48.50.205]
X-Originating-Email: [coverdale@sympatico.ca]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP101DD84F37106529DF7E74CD0A50@phx.gbl>
Received: from PaulNewPC ([70.48.50.205]) by BLU0-SMTP101.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:59:05 -0700
From: Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
To: 'Anisse Taleb' <anisse.taleb@huawei.com>, 'Jean-Marc Valin' <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>, 'Stephen Botzko' <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
References: <64212FE1AE068044AD567CCB214073F123A10234@MAIL2.octasic.com> <4d9b578f.8290d80a.3048.202f@mx.google.com> <BANLkTikAFsq5Y_9DS7L5kbMoa8R5EfpQ0A@mail.gmail.com> <4D9B5E6C.4060204@octasic.com> <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC4832@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC4832@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:59:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-index: Acvvs3Ht08yd3cjQKU2HC38NwReYfwEBjYow///yvACAAAapAP/+/wvA//2onTA=
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2011 13:59:05.0576 (UTC) FILETIME=[CAC03E80:01CBF462]
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:57:24 -0000

Yes, mobile network + Opus is one likely tandemming scenario, as well as
tandemming with fixed private networks which use non-G.711 codecs.

...Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Anisse Taleb
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:48 AM
To: Jean-Marc Valin; Stephen Botzko
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing

> > I would also suggest at least one tandeming test.
> 
> What use case would you suggest that involves tandeming?

I can see many, for instance a wideband call to a 3G mobile network
subscriber would need to either use AMR-WB or trans-code to AMR-WB.

Mvh,
/Anisse