IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates?

"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Mon, 12 April 2010 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9C83A68AF for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BY5tQy7o1CHD for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2E63A6868 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1O1SVr-0004cV-Oo; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:53:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: kpfleming@digium.com
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:53:51 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/8#comment:1
Message-ID: <071.0bc6655c98ff0335ad26ee705d9f5ce9@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.89d7aa91c79b145b798b83610e45ce71@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 8
In-Reply-To: <062.89d7aa91c79b145b798b83610e45ce71@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: kpfleming@digium.com, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: trac@localhost.amsl.com
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:53:57 -0000

#8: Sample rates?
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hoene@…                 |       Owner:     
     Type:  enhancement             |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                   |   Milestone:     
Component:  requirements            |     Version:     
 Severity:  Active WG Document      |    Keywords:     
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment(by kpfleming@…):

 If our goal is to use RTP AVP/SAVP/AVPF/SAVPF profiles for transport (as
 seems likely), then differences in sample rates between stream offers must
 be listed separately in the SDP. Whether they have a different codec
 'name' in the SDP or not seems less important, because the combination of
 the codec name and sample rate is required to uniquely identify the format
 in any case. Note that this is *sample rate*, and not bitstream rate.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/8#comment:1>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email