Re: [codec] Summary of test results
Erik Norvell <erik.norvell@ericsson.com> Tue, 21 June 2011 13:04 UTC
Return-Path: <erik.norvell@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CD211E8113 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZJZqUHL-HGl for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AD511E8111 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c17ae00000262e-79-4e0096f67f07
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 31.DD.09774.6F6900E4; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.2.242]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:04:54 +0200
From: Erik Norvell <erik.norvell@ericsson.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>, "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:04:53 +0200
Thread-Topic: [codec] Summary of test results
Thread-Index: AcwsVrEpd/k+UGIlQS2Xpv5SXCEkyQDvMThg
Message-ID: <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF18634B66E9@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <4DFA5106.1040903@octasic.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DFA5106.1040903@octasic.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [codec] Summary of test results
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:04:56 -0000
Hi Jean-Marc, Thank you for compiling this summary of pre-Opus tests. It should definitely help in designing the listening test on the final Opus. One comment to section 3: "While Opus has evolved since these tests were conducted, the results should be considered as a _lower bound_ on the quality of the final codec." I would like to think that the sum is always greater than it's parts, but it is definitely possible to make something worse by working on it. Hence, statements about Opus performance must be based on tests made on the final codec. Best regards, Erik > -----Original Message----- > From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin > Sent: den 16 juni 2011 20:53 > To: codec@ietf.org > Subject: [codec] Summary of test results > > Hi, > > We've collected all the test results we could find for Opus > (and pre-Opus) and how they relate to the requirements. We > summarized it all in the following draft: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-valin-codec-results-00 > > Cheers, > > Jean-Marc > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >
- [codec] Summary of test results Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Erik Norvell
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Erik Norvell
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Summary of test results Jean-Marc Valin