Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 20:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3781298C7 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N7CGOXWqBXTl for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F9DC1298C5 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uA2KEv3I000197 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:15:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:15:20 -0500
Message-ID: <559E9380-F02F-4F8D-9C02-8D784BF2A0FD@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <581A485F.3000803@mozilla.com>
References: <20161102190547.CBBE1B80109@rfc-editor.org> <581A485F.3000803@mozilla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/W44rPKfIUBxMjakr_zN_7F5kr3A>
Cc: atomnuker@gmail.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, codec@ietf.org, alissa@cooperw.in, koenvos74@gmail.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:38:12 -0000
On 2 Nov 2016, at 15:11, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > RFC Errata System wrote: >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnuker@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 5.1.1 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> rng >> rng = rng - --- * (fh - fl) >> ft >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> rng >> rng = rng - --- * (ft - fh) >> ft >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Equation should match with the one in the range decoder (section >> 4.1.2), however comparing the two and the reference implementation >> reveals the equation in section 5.1.1 to be incorrect. > > I think this report is correct and should be Verified. Although the > code is authoritative, this section of the text is complete enough for > someone to implement this feature directly from the text, so it will > cause confusion if they don't actually match. Done. Thanks! Ben.
- Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (… Timothy B. Terriberry
- [codec] [Errata Verified] RFC6716 (4853) RFC Errata System
- Re: [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (… Ben Campbell
- [codec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6716 (4853) RFC Errata System