Re: [codec] R128 tags, per-file or per-stream?
"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Sun, 31 August 2014 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFDF1A8989 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xb9c_x4tQGe for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1951A8A96 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.0.43] (50-78-100-113-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.78.100.113]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B5E9F218C for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54036784.704@xiph.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:20:52 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <20140831162155.GI326@hex.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20140831162155.GI326@hex.shelbyville.oz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/Z1wowZesRIxiQN_SYr4EjWVfw34
Subject: Re: [codec] R128 tags, per-file or per-stream?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:20:56 -0000
Ron wrote: > Does anyone have any reason to think we need to say something different > to that here? I'm assuming the current text was a 'typo', but I don't > know offhand if someone actually intended it to mean something other > than that. No, I think you're right. Just fix it.
- [codec] R128 tags, per-file or per-stream? Ron
- Re: [codec] R128 tags, per-file or per-stream? Timothy B. Terriberry