Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay / frame size depended processing delay?

"codec issue tracker" <trac+codec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Thu, 16 June 2011 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+codec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D85D11E814C for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HoEyWzmSxxnm for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36871F0C3B for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <trac+codec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1QXEzm-0007V5-0X; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:00:38 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac+codec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:00:37 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19#comment:7
Message-ID: <071.067161000b5135fc3b160d5c43fa5e14@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.f8b0d2abf056a9655a81ee25366bb354@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 19
In-Reply-To: <062.f8b0d2abf056a9655a81ee25366bb354@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+codec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:50:03 -0700
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay / frame size depended processing delay?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: codec@ietf.org
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:00:48 -0000

#19: How large is the frame size depended delay / the serialization delay /
frame size depended processing delay?

Changes (by jean-marc.valin@…):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed


Comment:

 See gmaxwell comment above

-- 
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hoene@…                 |        Owner:        
     Type:  enhancement             |       Status:  closed
 Priority:  minor                   |    Milestone:        
Component:  requirements            |      Version:        
 Severity:  -                       |   Resolution:  fixed 
 Keywords:                          |  
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19#comment:7>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>