Re: [codec] Comment on Opus Draft 07: Section 4 Range decoder

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Thu, 28 July 2011 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1839367b2=tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3934521F8A55 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JLHVvjKauwTu for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxip0i.isis.unc.edu (mxip0i.isis.unc.edu [152.2.0.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A92621F89CC for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EALzVMU6sGgRa/2dsb2JhbAA0AQEEAT5GAQUMDCEiDwkDAgECAQJRBw4BDgKoUIh8wzeGQQSHWYsghHgPi30
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,613,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="191197768"
Received: from mr2a.isis.unc.edu (HELO smtp.unc.edu) ([172.26.4.90]) by mxip0o.isis.unc.edu with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2011 17:34:04 -0400
X-UNC-Auth-As: tterribe
X-UNC-Auth-IP: 130.129.18.147
Received: from [130.129.18.147] (dhcp-1293.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.18.147]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.unc.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6SLY10M025424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E31D5C9.2020900@xiph.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:34:01 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101120 Gentoo/2.0.10 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <008501cc4c6f$e1f7b550$a5e71ff0$@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <008501cc4c6f$e1f7b550$a5e71ff0$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] Comment on Opus Draft 07: Section 4 Range decoder
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:34:32 -0000

> some editorial comments to the opus draft version 7, Section 4.1 to 4.1.2
>
> [snip]
>
> just a request: If you are considering my input and if you are change the
> draft, please send me brief feedback on which changes are included and why
> the other are not considered. Thanks

Just a quick note: I appreciate the editorial comments and will address 
them shortly, but I haven't had a chance to yet. Once I've merged my 
local copy of the draft with Jean-Marc's, I'll go over them in more 
detail and let you (and the list) know.