[codec] #11: Packet loss concealment?
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Sun, 11 April 2010 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B213A687B for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxqiSFlZab9v for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679733A67FE for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1O0yZb-0005Aa-6k; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:55:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:55:43 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/11
Message-ID: <062.348f1aead12a1cf82f83703f06be8fb5@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 11
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: [codec] #11: Packet loss concealment?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: trac@localhost.amsl.com
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:55:48 -0000
#11: Packet loss concealment?
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hoene@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Will PLC be a mandatory component of the codec? Will the codec provide an
implementation of PLC, but with the hooks to allow different and
potentially improved (or network condition specific) implementations of
PLC to be substituted in the codec?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/11>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #11: Packet loss concealment? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #11: Packet loss concealment? codec issue tracker