Re: [codec] requirements #28 (closed): Layered bit-stream
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Tue, 25 January 2011 00:15 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4338C3A69BF for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:15:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2azc3JbQV0AQ for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CF13A69B8 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1PhWbo-0002D3-N1; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:18:08 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:18:08 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/28#comment:3
Message-ID: <071.f471d03f793e74c6048720699b720551@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.23d5df12c0b3d27cb5b6b25801ab2a4d@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 28
In-Reply-To: <062.23d5df12c0b3d27cb5b6b25801ab2a4d@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: gmaxwell@juniper.net, hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] requirements #28 (closed): Layered bit-stream
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: codec@ietf.org
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:15:14 -0000
#28: Layered bit-stream Changes (by gmaxwell@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => worksforme Comment: I haven't seen any recent discussion or interest in changing the current "desirable but not mandatory" language in the requirements draft. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-codec-requirements-02.txt 5.3. Layered bit-stream A layered codec makes it possible to transmit only a certain subset of the bits and still obtain a valid bit-stream with a quality that is equivalent to the quality that would be obtained from encoding at the corresponding rate. While this is not a necessary feature for most applications, it can be desirable for cases where a "mixing server" needs to handle a large number of streams with limited computational resources. -- ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: hoene@… | Owner: Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: requirements | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: worksforme Keywords: | ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/28#comment:3> codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Dmitry Yudin
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Dmitry Yudin
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream Dmitry Yudin
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #28: Layered bit-stream codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #28 (closed): Layered bi… codec issue tracker