IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing

Ron <ron@debian.org> Sat, 09 April 2011 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497B43A6876 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-fadlCvaBQ5 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095953A6835 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApkHAAx4oE120qsf/2dsb2JhbACZB40WeMAQhW4EhVmHfw
Received: from ppp118-210-171-31.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([118.210.171.31]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2011 00:51:49 +0930
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26604F8F3 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:51:47 +0930 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9weRlxx5wQPU for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:51:47 +0930 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 123684F8FE; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:51:47 +0930 (CST)
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:51:47 +0930
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: codec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110409152146.GK30415@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <21200823.2625297.1302284060278.JavaMail.root@lu2-zimbra> <BLU0-SMTP11D0135F8FFEEEB308A1E9D0A70@phx.gbl> <4d9f7107.a7fed80a.542d.ffffa087@mx.google.com> <20110409030611.GG30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BANLkTinxSukUxhVO3c3mmtd4pDHYBqRY6w@mail.gmail.com> <4da00764.1407e30a.1423.ffffb78a@mx.google.com> <20110409095721.GH30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <4da04588.cac3e30a.1c01.ffffc261@mx.google.com> <20110409123852.GI30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <4da0709a.0504d90a.5dd9.ffffb602@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4da0709a.0504d90a.5dd9.ffffb602@mx.google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:20:06 -0000

On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:42:59PM +0300, Roni Even wrote:
> Jean Marc,
> G.722.1 and G.722.1C were mentioned as royalty free codecs. Is OPUS one?

Has anyone requested or obtained a royalty from anyone using it?
That should give as black and white an answer to that question as there is.

Now can we please stop repeating this.  There was another list set up
specifically for telling patent ghost stories.

Thanks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email