Re: [codec] USAC as reference?
David Virette <david.virette@huawei.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <david.virette@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECAFE0705 for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t+uG3TEUm8T9 for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083AE0685 for <codec@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LJP008W75NLWF@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d009000303 ([10.220.139.89]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LJP00A175NDBT@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:02:01 +0200
From: David Virette <david.virette@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <000301cbfabc$9e6584c0$db308e40$@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Christian Hoene' <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>, 'Anisse Taleb' <anisse.taleb@huawei.com>
Message-id: <016201cbfb75$b22bc730$16835590$%virette@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-language: fr
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-index: Acv6vJyV7uXqF9taS2O86Q8I1GdMDQAg6m/Q
References: <000301cbfabc$9e6584c0$db308e40$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] USAC as reference?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:02:15 -0000
Dear Christian, all, The only reference quality implementation of USAC is owned by the initial proponents of the codec. If the group wants to test OPUS vs USAC, the best way is probably to inform MPEG that IETF would like to conduct some tests comparing those two codecs. Regarding the inclusion of OPUS in the USAC verification tests, the test plan and accompanying workplan have already been agreed and the first round of testing will occur in June. However, it is foreseen to have a second round of testing by the end of the year. It could be proposed to include OPUS in this second phase. As Anisse said, there will be an MPEG meeting in July, this leaves enough time to liaise with MPEG before the next meeting. But I think that only a standardized codec could be included in the USAC verification tests. Best regards, David David Virette HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. Building C Riesstrasse 25 80992 Munich, Germany Tel: +49 89 158834 4148 Fax: +49 89 158834 4447 Mobile: +49 1622047469 E-mail: david.virette@huawei.com www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -----Original Message----- From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hoene Sent: jeudi 14 avril 2011 17:57 To: 'Anisse Taleb' Cc: codec@ietf.org Subject: [codec] USAC as reference? Hi Anisse, It is possible you ask your colleagues (e.g. David Virette) whether we can access a reference implementation of USAC? It would be quite interesting to watch the contest Opus vs. USAC. Do you have any internal data on this, which you want to share? With best regards, Christian --------------------------------------------------------------- Dr.-Ing. Christian Hoene Interactive Communication Systems (ICS), Universität Tübingen Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, Phone +49 7071 2970532 http://www.net.uni-tuebingen.de/ _______________________________________________ codec mailing list codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
- [codec] USAC as reference? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? David Virette
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] USAC as reference? David Virette