Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS

Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9FA21F8B91 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBj1BabwrUHp for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1394821F8D6D for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwf5 with SMTP id 5so4540208wwf.13 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eb1k61/WZbScjMDj9GyRhBUF9kptohew0TRyW+casek=; b=rJXaz7vebFsXGB7Nlw8SfS6yG9ATOqV18+ok0EhvjJuAaEA4SJiOhb+c+71pxMramz Q2g9S7SC5O4/eag6MA/Zged/WutJvwfm6zauH2zHv0TjpHMFc3RYZn7Bn8V3SstfSf+9 PNDTSYUJ2lQc3E6gY+Wtsn5aSAU2BTtAcZsJ4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.10.139 with SMTP id p11mr5755605wbp.61.1315362183553; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.28.218 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA8C1033.3089B%stewe@stewe.org>
References: <35921B63-3FBC-411D-B587-4AB81F218E57@cisco.com> <CA8C1033.3089B%stewe@stewe.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:23:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CACrD=+9d8F8AMVh7WAhR5EBRdtN4ZhxG4aje_xYT2ATFWz8WDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com>
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>, codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:21:28 -0000

> Others, including myself, disagree with those "many people" (most of which
> are strong supporters of the Opus codec). So does obviously at least one
> rightholder (or better: their legal).

Simply as a point of information:

I would like to publicly state that after analysis, Xiph.Org does not
believe Opus infringes on any of the patents listed in the Qualcomm
IPR declaration.

Monty