Re: [codec] Last proposal for the update draft

Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> Mon, 20 June 2016 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9188A12D8AE for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2j2GyeBbSVth for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62B012D89E for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t129so178706469vka.1 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9TzWMyZokxmXutqEPgeagiw9VY89lfN3TPPr3/n2Mxw=; b=UQzmZkpwFcHBGLNAh7jrien7OeaviH5spvVDutJu8IIyMSs2EGozceHU/RRIC0grj3 rD9F+O7RHUB6QSODtVFcfG/Xb5eohAEXnFopFoXKlqCALa/Xe+Nkcw1l8PvMIGpnFX+g lcym9H8W/R3J6gdi74ZqNcD9riW/oO9FpdiOX3X0s03pbXDxRcr6Ws9N+3Cyh7rSsxgL JR+VCPbvsvap4bb4c+ShyCtOO9emUttCk7clj2oHQnvLT4jI4d5EDgD+UKeuY4JDfqZq 5YIpxtoI+UopV6NgCa/KQMS81QipMDrS8AMeiIGjdKtALnI/jqc8Qke+K6dgLN4Ae8Ke B64w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9TzWMyZokxmXutqEPgeagiw9VY89lfN3TPPr3/n2Mxw=; b=TEgwRUq46wSAfZbWAeNt47lUjg0ZUjfD7wNU8Qy0qWSo1xh2rOYiErvlS8o0d1asan Unc0dngCRRcS5/aZR+8QWZtLNiyUSl8gvXl9TzBcBh06B8Mublfgd+Z3CXNIdax03zlP 4rcAViFiaDVSIRQ/j8/CTJgjkZLBe+rVB3L1klQQLXi7LuNaDDYLmLhhZA4lp2S4xuWF XB1s9hzwwZsqumpVqKtiorWaAKaR/2DrAy7WSnpUuvDFbUQrrQHq31FGQGDugFocqRWH WD2WU17a7s6iv1j9xRJkdjw1aKDxSFbvoOVoo7rRc0DCsYteeMyZXk5xFvWrUwxlyQb3 Td5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIIH68tKy59oc4tIINljWCPc5dR5F5lkRJfo1AE7nDMS8anhk5DhwwMwKF40WxmDsG2mH4HthtUrxIpYA==
X-Received: by 10.159.40.37 with SMTP id c34mr4277155uac.79.1466387755651; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.94.67 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d743fe38-a558-770d-9a23-2c37900b47ec@jmvalin.ca>
References: <d743fe38-a558-770d-9a23-2c37900b47ec@jmvalin.ca>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:55:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTjq6tOYLN52PL-UHbFYNfQ1fhWk8YKQrp=-zePm_-C0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/bvvqdPL-P5jOXfI4R47-Z6-B6hM>
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] Last proposal for the update draft
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:56:01 -0000

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca> wrote:
> My proposed solution is to fix the folding behaviour so that it is
> never forced to fall back to LCG due to not enough folding data. This
> is achieved by simply repeating part of the first band in the folding
> of the second band. The proposed patch is available at:
> https://git.xiph.org/?p=opus.git;a=commitdiff;h=949c7f33181
> It's a decoder-only change and it fixes the low-bitrate pre-echo
> problem. I uploaded a short example that demonstrates the problem and
> the fix. This is before the change:
> http://jmvalin.ca/misc_stuff/fix_before.wav
> and this is after the change:
> http://jmvalin.ca/misc_stuff/fix_after.wav
> Note especially the "t" in the word "tour", which has noticeable HF
> pre-echo in the "before" file. Both files are decoded from the same 16
> kb/s CBR bit-stream.
>
> The fix does not impact compatibility, because the improvement does
> not depend on the encoder doing anything special. I also do not see
> any case where an encoder could have effectively used the current
> broken behaviour to improve quality over the proposed change.
>
> For these reasons, I think it should be included in the update draft.

This appears reasonable to me, and I also do not see a way in which
the old behavior could be usefully used, or any way that this would be
likely to cause serious incompatibility.