[codec] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 31 July 2018 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE74130DD1; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics@ietf.org, Tim Terriberry <tterriberry@mozilla.com>, codec-chairs@ietf.org, tterriberry@mozilla.com, codec@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153307969456.3468.10316294264002492424.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:28:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/eDm3XExyhI6kglb8rOdctrVoowo>
Subject: [codec] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:28:15 -0000

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for everyone's work on this document. I have two minor comments.



Are implementors intended to assume that the elided matrix coefficients are all
0.0? If so, it's probably best to say so explicitly.



To be clear, these code points that are being reserved are for experimental
channel mappings in general, not just channel mappings that are specific to
ambisonics, right? If so, I would suggest calling this out explicitly.