Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requirements-02
"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Mon, 24 January 2011 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6642F3A693C for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUGNscJ58CDj for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (mx05.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452CA3A6904 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoeneT60 (p5B2011D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.32.17.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx05.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0OKAYvQ011263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:10:40 +0100
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Stephen Botzko' <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
References: <4D3AD6EA.5020607@jdrosen.net> <000001cbbad6$4f44aea0$edce0be0$@uni-tuebingen.de> <AANLkTi=xTwet-toobezTZAsitgdTnTrMCHDD3OqChxF7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xTwet-toobezTZAsitgdTnTrMCHDD3OqChxF7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:10:35 +0100
Organization: Universitat Tubingen
Message-ID: <001001cbbc02$c6acf010$5406d030$@uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01CBBC0B.28715810"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIWDjsml9J24OP+D1jOWj/YeoWjlgHEh91YAdiRriCTLvNgEA==
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus: NOT checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.1.2; host: mx05)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requirements-02
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:07:49 -0000
Christian - perhaps you could post a list of the issues you see that haven't been addressed? [Christian Hoene] No Stephen, these issues have been written down in previous emails, drafts and issues in the Trac. They can be read by anybody anytime. Thus, I do not see any benefit of repeating them again if the editors continue to ignore any input. Indeed, they did not improve the draft despite sound technical reasons. Even if somebody is not fully involved in the technical details: It is very odd that despite many hundreds emails and many discussions since starting this WG the editors have not updated the draft beside minor changes such as the boilerplate and typos. Even if the lack of any update was not intentionally, the editors missed to do their job because they were too lazy or rather too busy doing other thinks. I would be sad if all the fruitful discussions here and all the good contributions of many industry experts should have been in vain. Even if not all requirements can be met by Opus, a proper requirements document may be relevant for future solutions or other SDOs. CH
- [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requireme… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Mary Barnes
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Elwell, John
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requi… Mary Barnes