Re: [codec] Tübingen Test plan

"Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu> Mon, 15 August 2011 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BEA21F8CC5 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.123
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.123 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyOlJ3mgyw14 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us12.unix.fas.harvard.edu (us12.unix.fas.harvard.edu [140.247.35.203]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DBD21F8CB0 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us12.unix.fas.harvard.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by us12.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E936650A5; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mail; bh=ul6QWZUD72gavOZ mqvazpV4h159GH5+W3HS+JxruxqI=; b=qfRPnGSOBtJRdxjEoZFy3ZVDu/1OYul RgATLQXS+DaMEZy3FM54OwjagCci8nCq2Oh4lVBxiBHVS1CMQy7iLJQeqiNqLf2M V9aE9eKIVjFL3sm/rT5/LTgAF/O7utC2PnqbhK3AIimd1HaSyMrCTyLXWuFUG2c9 0knMudaaR8Bo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=mail; b=MySd0PaTd T9Q8TolxUT+nvTZw2RqgwLJ3omLnFRjRlPkxomkLU3PzzI2cZFycRejxbvbHNsGy K6MDtdOJ0ponSmYgK+D4VV7nca3MuShw4/nZ2EqKKs3TBJkcuLZdOIxCuIUF4LHo 2dezwGsXt7ZozVvPVKLbwAn32VIwYyAPfY=
Received: from [172.23.141.92] (bwhmaincampuspat25.partners.org [170.223.207.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bmschwar@fas) by us12.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D1056650A4; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E495EA9.8020702@fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:09 -0400
From: "Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <000d01cc5ab9$30ef71f0$92ce55d0$@uni-tuebingen.de> <1586180885.47515.1313353689004.JavaMail.root@lu2-zimbra> <005501cc5b25$17e03930$47a0ab90$@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <005501cc5b25$17e03930$47a0ab90$@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig99EF2C70AD032F2C85B83DBD"
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] Tübingen Test plan
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bens@alum.mit.edu
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:59:28 -0000

> What audio bandwidths are you planning to use for the Opus test cases?
> 
> */[Christian Hoene] Actually, Opus selects the mode by itself. I have
> printed out the following data/*
...
> */Mode HYBRID bitRate 32000 fs 48000 channels 2 framesize 960/*
> 
> */Mode SILK bitRate 16000 fs 48000 channels 2 framesize 960/*

I'm not sure what you mean by "printed out" ... but bear in mind that Opus
always supports a samplerate (fs) of 48000, regardless of the audio
bandwidth.  I believe the current encoder's bandwidth-selection heuristics
would code 16kbps stereo Silk at Narrowband (4 kHz bandpass), and 32kbps
stereo Hybrid at Superwideband (12 kHz bandpass).

--Ben