[codec] #12: bit-exact vs. bit-compatible?
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Sun, 11 April 2010 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1553A6808 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5T8rk+yQHFW for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2D33A67FE for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1O0ya5-0005BR-Ve; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:56:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:56:13 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/12
Message-ID: <062.8c126c3a81785b4856060d1e2a0914c8@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 12
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: [codec] #12: bit-exact vs. bit-compatible?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: trac@localhost.amsl.com
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:56:18 -0000
#12: bit-exact vs. bit-compatible? ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: hoene@… | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: requirements | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- will all variations of the codec allow bit-compatible implementation, or will we specify a bit-exact variation of the codec (e.g. Specifying a bit- exact fixed point implementation of the lowest sample rate variation of the codec)? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/12> codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #12: bit-exact vs. bit-compatible? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Raymond (Juin-Hwey) Chen
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] requirements #12 (closed): bit-exact … Jean-Marc Valin